Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/30194
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorPereira, L. J.-
dc.creatorFoureaux, R. C.-
dc.creatorPereira, C. V.-
dc.creatorAlves, M. C.-
dc.creatorCampos, C. H.-
dc.creatorGarcia, R. C. M. Rodrigues-
dc.creatorAndrade, E. F.-
dc.creatorGonçalves, T. M. S. V.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-27T15:22:31Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-27T15:22:31Z-
dc.date.issued2016-07-
dc.identifier.citationPEREIRA, L. J. et al. Oral physiology, nutrition and quality of life in diabetic patients associated or not with hypertension and beta‐blockers therapy. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, Oxford, v. 43, n. 7, p. 511-518, July 2016.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/joor.12398pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/30194-
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between type 2 diabetes oral physiology, nutritional intake and quality of life has not been fully elucidated. We assessed the impact of type 2 diabetes – exclusive or associated with hypertension with beta‐blockers treatment – on oral physiology, mastication, nutrition and quality of life. This cross‐sectional study was performed with 78 complete dentate subjects (15 natural teeth and six masticatory units minimum; without removable or fixed prostheses), divided into three groups: diabetics (DM) (n = 20; 45·4 ± 9·5 years), diabetics with hypertension and receiving beta‐blockers treatment (DMH) (n = 19; 41·1 ± 5·1 years) and controls (n = 39; 44·5 ± 11·7 years) matched for gender, age and socioeconomic status. Blood glucose, masticatory performance, swallowing threshold, taste, food intake, stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow, pH and buffering capacity of saliva were assessed. Glycemia was higher in DM than in controls (P < 0·01). No differences were observed between DM and controls for nutrition and quality of life. Both stimulated and unstimulated salivary flow rate were lower in DMH (P < 0·01), which also presented the lowest number of teeth and masticatory units (P < 0·0001), and reduction in the number of chewing cycles (P < 0·01). Controls showed lower Decayed Missing Filled Teeth index (DMFT) scores in comparison with DMH (P = 0·021). Masticatory performance and saliva buffering capacity were similar among groups. Exclusive type 2 diabetes did not alter oral physiology, nutrition or quality of life. However, when hypertension and beta‐blockers treatment were associated with diabetes, the salivary flow rate, chewing cycles and number of teeth decreased.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherWileypt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceJournal of Oral Rehabilitationpt_BR
dc.subjectOral physiologypt_BR
dc.subjectDental physiological phenomenapt_BR
dc.subjectOral healthpt_BR
dc.subjectFisiologia oralpt_BR
dc.subjectFenômenos fisiológicos dentáriospt_BR
dc.subjectSaúde bucalpt_BR
dc.titleOral physiology, nutrition and quality of life in diabetic patients associated or not with hypertension and beta‐blockers therapypt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DEF - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.