Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
metadata.artigo.dc.title: An analysis of five different native and web-hybrid platforms for building android apps and their accessibility for screen readers
metadata.artigo.dc.creator: Carvalho, Lucas Pedroso
Dias, Felipe Silva
Freire, André Pimenta
metadata.artigo.dc.subject: Mobile accessibility
Mobile development approaches
Screen readers 2018
metadata.artigo.dc.identifier.citation: CARVALHO, L. P.; DIAS, F. S.; FREIRE, A. P. An analysis of five different native and web-hybrid platforms for building android apps and their accessibility for screen readers. SBC Journal on Interactive Systems, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 3, 2018.
metadata.artigo.dc.description.abstract: The choice of an interface platform to develop mobile applications may have important implications to how accessible the resulting product can be for visually-disabled users. This paper aimed to analyze four platforms to develop native and web-hybrid mobile Android applications, and to verify the adequacy of their interface components to implement mobile applications, in order to identify the main accessibility problems that could be encountered by developers when using them, and the main strategies to overcome those issues. We built 5 prototypes of mobile applications with the aim of adhering as much as possible to accessibility recommendations. The applications were built using techniques of native applications developed with Android Studio with and without Web components and hybrid development using the frameworks Apache Cordova, Ionic and Appcelerator Titanium. We then performed an accessibility inspection of a sample of 30 Android interface components present in 5 prototypes of mobile applications, to verify their adequacy for working with screen readers. The results showed that the prototypes developed using web components were more compatible with accessibility criteria in the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG 2.0) and with the screen reader TalkBack. The most frequent accessibility problems in native components occurred in tables, headings and multimedia elements. We conclude by showing initial evidence that webbased components in hybrid applications developed using webhybrid and native with embedded web components currently have better support for accessibility than applications with only native components.
metadata.artigo.dc.language: en_US
Appears in Collections:DCC - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.