Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/43011
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorMenezes, Michele Duarte de-
dc.creatorBispo, Fábio Henrique Alves-
dc.creatorFaria, Wilson Missina-
dc.creatorGonçalves, Mariana Gabriele Marcolino-
dc.creatorCuri, Nilton-
dc.creatorGuilherme, Luiz Roberto Guimarães-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-11T17:59:09Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-11T17:59:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-04-10-
dc.identifier.citationMENEZES, M. D. de et al. Modeling arsenic content in Brazilian soils: What is relevant? Science of The Total Environment, Amsterdam, v. 712, 136511, 10 Apr. 2020.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0048969720300206#!pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/43011-
dc.description.abstractArsenic accumulation in the environment poses ecological and human health risks. A greater knowledge about soil total As content variability and its main drivers is strategic for maintaining soil security, helping public policies and environmental surveys. Considering the poor history of As studies in Brazil at the country's geographical scale, this work aimed to generate predictive models of topsoil As content using machine learning (ML) algorithms based on several environmental covariables representing soil forming factors, ranking their importance as explanatory covariables and for feeding group analysis. An unprecedented databank based on laboratory analyses (including rare earth elements), proximal and remote sensing, geographical information system operations, and pedological information were surveyed. The median soil As content ranged from 0.14 to 41.1 mg kg−1 in reference soils, and 0.28 to 58.3 mg kg−1 in agricultural soils. Recursive Feature Elimination Random Forest outperformed other ML algorithms, ranking as most important environmental covariables: temperature, soil organic carbon (SOC), clay, sand, and TiO2. Four natural groups were statistically suggested (As content ± standard error in mg kg−1): G1) with coarser texture, lower SOC, higher temperatures, and the lowest TiO2 contents, has the lowest As content (2.24 ± 0.50), accomplishing different environmental conditions; G2) organic soils located in floodplains, medium TiO2 and temperature, whose As content (3.78 ± 2.05) is slightly higher than G1, but lower than G3 and G4; G3) medium contents of As (7.14 ± 1.30), texture, SOC, TiO2, and temperature, representing the largest number of points widespread throughout Brazil; G4) the largest contents of As (11.97 ± 1.62), SOC, and TiO2, and the lowest sand content, with points located mainly across Southeastern Brazil with milder temperature. In the absence of soil As content, a common scenario in Brazil and in many Latin American countries, such natural groups could work as environmental indicators.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceScience of The Total Environmentpt_BR
dc.subjectCluster analysispt_BR
dc.subjectEnvironmental covariatespt_BR
dc.subjectGrouping analysispt_BR
dc.subjectMachine learningpt_BR
dc.subjectVariable importancept_BR
dc.subjectAnálise de clusterpt_BR
dc.subjectCovariáveis ambientaispt_BR
dc.subjectAnálise de agrupamentopt_BR
dc.subjectAprendizado de máquinapt_BR
dc.subjectImportância variávelpt_BR
dc.titleModeling arsenic content in Brazilian soils: What is relevant?pt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DCS - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.