Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/43016
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorMancini, Marcelo-
dc.creatorSilva, Sérgio Henrique Godinho-
dc.creatorTeixeira, Anita Fernanda dos Santos-
dc.creatorGuilherme, Luiz Roberto Guimarães-
dc.creatorCuri, Nilton-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-11T17:59:46Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-11T17:59:46Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.citationMANCINI, M. et al. Soil parent material prediction for Brazil via proximal soil sensing. Geoderma Regional, [S. l.], v. 22, e00310, Sept. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00310.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352009420300596#!pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/43016-
dc.description.abstractParent material (PM) is key in the thorough understanding of soils. However, the complexity of PM distributions and the difficulty of reaching PM in deep soils prevent its detailed assessment. Proximal sensors, such as the portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF), might ease this process. This work attempts to prove the potential of pXRF to predict different PMs from analyses of soil samples. The study encompassed five Brazilian states representing 1,541,309.409 km2, from where 310 soil samples of various soil classes derived from 12 different PMs were collected and analyzed by PXRF. Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) algorithms were used for modeling. Modeling comprised three datasets: one containing all data (310 samples), a dataset with younger soils (151 samples) and one with older soils, conceptually less influenced by their PM (159 samples), to understand how soil-PM chemical proximity affects prediction performance, assessed via overall accuracy and Kappa coefficient. Data distribution showed pXRF can discriminate PM types via their resulting soils, regardless of the degree of weathering. Prediction results were prominent: RF and SVM achieved roughly 0.9 Kappa and overall accuracy predicting all data. For the remaining datasets, SVM achieved 0.96 Kappa and RF nearly 0.92 for younger soils, and 0.87 and 0.9, respectively, for older soils, confirming that PMs of younger soils are slightly easier to predict, but even soils heavily altered by pedogenetic processes can be accurately predicted. Results confirm the pXRF potential to predict PM from soil data, which might help in soil mapping and its consequent activities in tropical conditions.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceGeoderma Regionalpt_BR
dc.subjectParent material (PM)pt_BR
dc.subjectPortable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF)pt_BR
dc.subjectTropical soilspt_BR
dc.subjectMachine learningpt_BR
dc.subjectGeological formationspt_BR
dc.subjectProximal soil sensingpt_BR
dc.subjectMaterial de origempt_BR
dc.subjectEspectrômetro portátil de fluorescência de raios-xpt_BR
dc.subjectSolos tropicaispt_BR
dc.subjectAprendizado de máquinapt_BR
dc.subjectFormações geológicaspt_BR
dc.subjectSensor de solo proximalpt_BR
dc.titleSoil parent material prediction for Brazil via proximal soil sensingpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DCS - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.