Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/43188
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorTurek, Maria Eliza-
dc.creatorVan Lier, Quirijn de Jong-
dc.creatorArmindo, Robson André-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-24T17:28:35Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-24T17:28:35Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-
dc.identifier.citationTUREK. M. E.; VAN LIER, Q. de J.; ARMINDO, R. A. Estimation and mapping of field capacity in Brazilian soils. Geoderma, [S. I.], v. 376, Oct. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114557.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114557pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/43188-
dc.description.abstractModeling soil water dynamics is important to support decision in planning and management policies. Field capacity (FC) is an important parameter in this context and its proper determination allows the use of simple models to assess soil water balance components. In this study we aimed estimation and mapping of FC in Brazilian soils based on available soil global data and pedotransfer functions (PTF). Soil basic data were obtained from the SoilGrids system in a 0.05 × 0.05° spatial grid covering the Brazilian territory, with a resolution of approximately 5 km. Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) and water retention curve (SWRC) were estimated by PTFs and used as input in the agro-hydrological model SWAP to simulate an internal drainage experiment without evapotranspiration, until the drainage at the bottom profile reached negligible flux density values (qfc) of: 0.25, 1.0 and 4.0 mm d−1, considered to correspond to FC. Simulations were performed considering three soil depths (zfc) of 30, 60 and 100 cm. FC was classified according to major soil textural and pedological classes. Uncertainty was evaluated by the sensitivity of the model to the soil hydraulic properties and the grid cell size. The highest soil matric potential at FC (hfc) was observed for loam texture while the lowest hfc was observed for sandy loam texture. Between soil pedological classes, Gleysols presented the lowest hfc. The results showed that FC estimation is sensitive to zfc and qfc. Spatial agreement between patterns of Ks, FC and soil class were observed according to the evaluated database. The qfc value of 4.0 mm d−1 presented reasonable results for estimating FC in Brazilian soils, in agreement with expected drainage time following saturation, with average values below 4 days for the evaluated depths and hfc around −30 cm. Estimation of FC with PTF showed underestimation of hfc varying from double to almost fourfolds times. The usually adopted hfc of −330 cm does not represent the FC for Brazilian soils. Furthermore, a qfc lower than 1.0 mm d−1 did not yield usable values for FC.pt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceGeodermapt_BR
dc.subjectHydraulic propertiespt_BR
dc.subjectPedofunctionpt_BR
dc.subjectSoilGridspt_BR
dc.subjectAgro-hydrological model SWAPpt_BR
dc.subjectAvailable waterpt_BR
dc.subjectSolos - Propriedades Hidráulicaspt_BR
dc.subjectPedofunçãopt_BR
dc.subjectSolos - Mapeamentopt_BR
dc.subjectModelo agro-hidrologico SWAPpt_BR
dc.subjectDisponibilidade da águapt_BR
dc.titleEstimation and mapping of field capacity in Brazilian soilspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DFI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.