Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/43206
metadata.artigo.dc.title: From sensor data to Munsell color system: machine learning algorithm applied to tropical soil color classification via Nix™ Pro sensor
metadata.artigo.dc.creator: Mancini, Marcelo
Weindorf, David C.
Monteiro, Maria Eduarda Carvalho
Faria, Álvaro José Gomes de
Teixeira, Anita Fernanda dos Santos
Lima, Wellington de
Lima, Francielle Roberta Dias de
Dijair, Thaís Santos Branco
Marques, Francisco D'Auria
Ribeiro, Diego
Silva, Sérgio Henrique Godinho
Chakraborty, Somsubhra
Curi, Nilton
metadata.artigo.dc.subject: Proximal sensors
Random Forest
Prediction models
Pedology
Color system
Sensores proximais
Floresta Aleatória
Modelos de predição
Pedologia
Sistema de cores
Solos tropicais - Cores
metadata.artigo.dc.publisher: Elsevier
metadata.artigo.dc.date.issued: Oct-2020
metadata.artigo.dc.identifier.citation: MANCINI, M. et al. From sensor data to Munsell color system: machine learning algorithm applied to tropical soil color classification via Nix™ Pro sensor. Geoderma, [S.I.], v. 375, Oct. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114471.
metadata.artigo.dc.description.abstract: Soil color has historically drawn humans’ attention, although its definition is somewhat subjective. It is correlated with several soil attributes and it allows for inferences about several soil aspects. New proximal sensors, such as the Nix™ Pro color sensor, can determine soil color values, but its correlation with the widely used Munsell soil color chart (MSCC) has yet to be investigated. This work aimed to train machine learning models using the Random Forest (RF) algorithm to predict each notation of MSCC chips from data extracted by the Nix™ Pro sensor, test the model’s accuracy by evaluating whether it can identify MSCC chips using a brand-new and a dirty MSCC, and compare model predictions with soil color classifications made by the human eye. Additionally, MSCC data obtained via Nix™ was compared to Munsell renotation data to assess the color detection accuracy of the sensor. Prediction models were calibrated by scanning every MSCC chip (437 in total) in triplicate. All validation samples were excluded from model calibration. Accuracy of the predictions of MSCC notation reached overall accuracy and Kappa index values of 0.93 for the brand-new MSCC and of 0.70 for the dirty MSCC. Soil color classification by human eye had little agreement with the predicted MSCC notation, as expected due to the variable conditions affecting soil color conventional determination in the field. Color difference was calculated by the Euclidian distance (ΔE*ab) between three color stimuli in the CIELAB color space. The mean ΔE*ab between Nix™-provided data and renotation data was 2.9, demonstrating high color detection accuracy. The Nix™ Pro color sensor allows for assessment of accurate color data. When applied together with machine learning algorithms, Nix™ Pro provides a reliable determination of soil color classification equivalent to MSCC in an easily reproducible, rapid, inexpensive and non-subjective way.
metadata.artigo.dc.identifier.uri: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114471
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/43206
metadata.artigo.dc.language: en
Appears in Collections:DCS - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.