Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/49975
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorSouza-Filho, Pedro Walfir M.-
dc.creatorLobo, Felipe de Lucia-
dc.creatorCavalcante, Rosane Barbosa Lopes-
dc.creatorMota, José Aroudo-
dc.creatorNascimento Jr., Wilson da Rocha-
dc.creatorSantos, Diogo C.-
dc.creatorNovo, Evlyn M. L. M.-
dc.creatorBarbosa, Claudio Clemente Faria-
dc.creatorSiqueira, José O.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-20T16:51:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-20T16:51:32Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-28-
dc.identifier.citationSOUZA-FILHO, P. W. M. et al. Land-use intensity of official mineral extraction in the Amazon region: linking economic and spatial data. Land Degradation & Development, [S.l.], v. 32, n. 4, p. 1706-1717, Feb. 2021. DOI: 10.1002/ldr.3810.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ldr.3810pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/49975-
dc.description.abstractThe Amazon region has suffered considerable deforestation rates related to logging, cattle ranching, and agriculture. Recently, attention has been given to deforestation due to mining activities. This paper aims to estimate the land area affected by mining activities in protected and nonprotected areas, the value of the traded mineral extraction per commodity, and the mineral commodity with the highest trade (mineral extraction per mining area). Our results show that mining activities occupied 1,110 km2 of the Amazon, where 65% and 35% of this was due to artisanal and industrial-scale mining, respectively. Gold exploitation was responsible for 58% of the total, followed by aluminum (15%), tin (13%), and iron (8%). In the region, 47% of the total mining area was located inside protected areas, where extraction was dominated by artisanal gold mining. The Amazonian states generated US$ 12.6 billion in 2017. Analysis of the values of the traded production showed that iron was responsible for 63.6%, followed by copper (16.2%), aluminum (7.6%), and gold (6.5%). The value of the traded production of gold was relatively low (US$ 810 million) in comparison to iron (US$ 8.01 billion) and copper (US$ 2.04 billion), which occupied the smallest areas. The value of the traded production per area showed that iron ore exploitation generated US$ 91.8 million/km2, while gold generated only 1.3 million/km2. We conclude that the industrial mining of iron ore presented the lowest impacts in mining areas with higher traded mineral extraction, while artisanal gold production ran contrary to environmental conservation goals.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherWileypt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceLand Degradation & Developmentpt_BR
dc.subjectAmazonpt_BR
dc.subjectDeforestationpt_BR
dc.subjectMining activitiespt_BR
dc.subjectProtected areapt_BR
dc.subjectRemote sensingpt_BR
dc.titleLand-use intensity of official mineral extraction in the Amazon region: linking economic and spatial datapt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DCS - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.