Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/53330
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorObando Vega, Felipe Andrés-
dc.creatorMontoya Rios, Ana Paola-
dc.creatorOsorio Saraz, Jairo Alexander-
dc.creatorDamasceno, Flávio Alves-
dc.creatorBarbari, Matteo-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-19T18:20:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-19T18:20:24Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-
dc.identifier.citationOBANDO VEGA, F. A. et al. Comparative analysis of the cooling efficiency in tropical climate of three alternative materials for evaporative cooling pads. Applied Sciences, Basel, v. 12, n. 1, 2022. DOI: 10.3390/app12010077.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/53330-
dc.description.abstractA comparison between commercial cellulose evaporative cooling pad and pads manufactured with three alternative materials was made for environmental conditions typical of tropical countries. Wind tunnel tests were carried out to compute the convective heat and mass transfer coefficients and to measure the pressure drop across each pad, obtaining expressions that can be used as reference for future simulations. Using a mathematical model, a detailed analysis of the efficiency, Temperature–Humidity Index, temperature drop and relative humidity through the pads was performed in terms of different operative and constructive conditions, such as air velocities, dry-bulb temperatures, relative humidity and pad thickness. Significant differences between the pressure drop across the pads were found, which increases with the inlet air velocity and water flow. A weak relation between the analysed variables and the inlet air velocity was found, while a high correlation between the analysed variables, pad thickness and the external environmental conditions was established. Cooling efficiencies above 40% and a Temperature–Humidity Index below the mild zone of thermal stress were obtained for the alternative panels. Although the cellulose cooling pad showed the best behaviour in all aspects, the alternative pads can be used as substituted in specific applications to reduce the Temperature–Humidity Index inside agricultural facilities.pt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)pt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsacesso abertopt_BR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceApplied Sciencespt_BR
dc.subjectCooling padpt_BR
dc.subjectCellulosept_BR
dc.subjectEvaporative coolingpt_BR
dc.subjectAlternative materialspt_BR
dc.subjectCooling efficiencypt_BR
dc.subjectTemperature–humidity indexpt_BR
dc.subjectResfriamento evaporativopt_BR
dc.subjectCelulosept_BR
dc.subjectMateriais alternativospt_BR
dc.subjectÍndice de temperatura e umidadept_BR
dc.titleComparative analysis of the cooling efficiency in tropical climate of three alternative materials for evaporative cooling padspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DEG - Artigos publicados em periódicos



Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons