Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/54433
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorSantos, Bárbara Chaves-
dc.creatorFerreira, Lívia Garcia-
dc.creatorRibeiro, Helem Sena-
dc.creatorCorreia, Maria Isabel Toulson Davisson-
dc.creatorLima, Agnaldo Soares-
dc.creatorPenna, Francisco Guilherme Cancela e-
dc.creatorAnastácio, Lucilene Rezende-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-01T20:37:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-01T20:37:49Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-
dc.identifier.citationSANTOS, B. C. et al. Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis in patients on the waiting list for liver transplant: Associated factors and prognostic effects. Nutrition, [S.l.], v. 94, Feb. 2022.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899900721003907?via%3Dihubpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/54433-
dc.description.abstractObjectives The aim of this study was to assess patients on the waiting list for liver transplant (LTx) according to bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA), as well as to verify the association between the placement of the vectors on the graph with clinical outcomes and identify the predictors to vector placement in quadrant 4 (Q4; indicating more hydration and less cellularity). Methods This was a retrospective observational study including 129 patients ≥20 y of age awaiting LTx. Patients’ nutritional status was assessed by using different tools, including single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis and the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). Clinical data were registered. The BIVA was evaluated by comparing the individual vectors plotted for all patients to the tolerance ellipses of 50%, 75%, and 95% of the reference healthy population. The quadrant of the vector for each patient was registered. Results The majority of the vectors were placed in Q1 (n = 54; 41.9%) and Q4 (n = 39; 30.2%). The presence of ascites or edema (hazard ratio [HR], 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15–5.12; P = 0.019) and the BIVA vector placed in Q4 in any ellipse (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.07–4.09; P = 0.029) were independent predictors for mortality on the waiting list or ≤1 y after LTx. BIVA was not associated with longer hospital length of stay. The predictors of vector placement in Q4 were higher age, malnutrition according to SGA, and presence of ascites or edema. Conclusion Patients on the waiting list for LTx with BIVA vectors placed in Q4, in the 50%, 75%, or 95% tolerance ellipses, presented a worse prognosis.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceNutritionpt_BR
dc.subjectLiver cirrhosispt_BR
dc.subjectLiver transplantationpt_BR
dc.subjectBioelectrical impedancept_BR
dc.subjectBioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA)pt_BR
dc.subjectMortalitypt_BR
dc.titleBioelectrical impedance vector analysis in patients on the waiting list for liver transplant: Associated factors and prognostic effectspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DCA - Artigos publicados em periódicos
DNU - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.