Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/55392
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorTurek, Maria Eliza-
dc.creatorPoggio, Laura-
dc.creatorBatjes, Niels H.-
dc.creatorArmindo, Robson André-
dc.creatorVan Lier, Quirijn de Jong-
dc.creatorSousa, Luis de-
dc.creatorHeuvelink, Gerard B. M.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-01T22:33:35Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-01T22:33:35Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationTUREK, M. E. et al. Global mapping of volumetric water retention at 100, 330 and 15 000 cm suction using the WoSIS database. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, [S. l.], 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2022.08.001.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/55392-
dc.description.abstractPresent global maps of soil water retention (SWR) are mostly derived from pedotransfer functions (PTFs) applied to maps of other basic soil properties. As an alternative, ‘point-based’ mapping of soil water content can improve global soil data availability and quality. We developed point-based global maps with estimated uncertainty of the volumetric SWR at 100, 330 and 15 000 cm suction using measured SWR data extracted from the WoSIS Soil Profile Database together with data estimated by a random forest PTF (PTF-RF). The point data was combined with around 200 environmental covariates describing vegetation, terrain morphology, climate, geology, and hydrology using DSM. In total, we used 7292, 33 192 and 42 016 SWR point observations at 100, 330 and 15 000 cm, respectively, and complemented the dataset with 436 108 estimated values at each suction. Tenfold cross-validation yielded a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 6.380, 7.112 and 6.485 10−2cm3cm−3, and a Model Efficiency Coefficient (MEC) of 0.430, 0.386, and 0.471, respectively, for 100, 330 and 15 000 cm. The results were also compared to three published global maps of SWR to evaluate differences between point-based and map-based mapping approaches. Point-based mapping performed better than the three map-based mapping approaches for 330 and 15 000 cm, while for 100 cm results were similar, possibly due to the limited number of SWR observations for 100 cm. Major sources or uncertainty identified included the geographical clustering of the data and the limitation of the covariates to represent the naturally high variation of SWR.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsacesso abertopt_BR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceInternational Soil and Water Conservation Researchpt_BR
dc.subjectDigital soil mappingpt_BR
dc.subjectSoil hydraulic propertiespt_BR
dc.subjectPedometricspt_BR
dc.subjectSoilGridspt_BR
dc.subjectMapeamento digital do solopt_BR
dc.subjectPropriedades hidráulicas do solopt_BR
dc.subjectPedometriapt_BR
dc.titleGlobal mapping of volumetric water retention at 100, 330 and 15 000 cm suction using the WoSIS databasept_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DFI - Artigos publicados em periódicos



Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons