Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/55575
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorPeñaflor, Maria Fernanda G. V.-
dc.creatorMauck, Kerry E.-
dc.creatorAlves, Kelly J.-
dc.creatorMoraes, Consuelo M. de-
dc.creatorMescher, Mark C.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-24T19:09:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-24T19:09:24Z-
dc.date.issued2016-10-
dc.identifier.citationPEÑAFLOR, M. F. G. V. et al. Effects of single and mixed infections of Bean pod mottle virus and Soybean mosaic virus on host‐plant chemistry and host-vector interactions. Functional Ecology, Oxford, v. 30, n. 10, p. 1648-1659, Oct. 2016.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1365-2435.12649pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/55575-
dc.description.abstractCo‐infection by vector‐borne plant viruses is common, yet few studies have explored the effects of mixed infections on host‐plant phenotypes or plant–vector interactions. We documented the effects of single and mixed infection by Bean pod mottle virus (BPMV) and Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) on key biochemical plant traits and the behaviour and performance of virus vectors (BPMV: Epilachna varivestis, SMV: Aphis glycines) in order to understand how virus‐induced changes in plant phenotypes might influence (i) the acquisition and transmission of each virus by its respective vector in single infections, (ii) the likelihood of secondary infection for plants singly infected with either virus and (iii) the implications of co‐infection for virus transmission by vectors. Single infection by either BPMV or SMV increased host‐plant palatability for E. varivestis, potentially enhancing vector acquisition of BPMV from BPMV‐infected plants as well as the risk of secondary BPMV infection in plants infected with SMV. However, co‐infected plants were no more palatable to beetle vectors than mock‐inoculated plants. BPMV infection had minimal impacts on A. glycines. SMV infection reduced A. glycines population growth, but increased aphid feeding preferences for infected plants, a pattern likely not conducive to the (non‐persistent) transmission of SMV. Co‐infection eliminated the negative effects of single SMV infection on aphid population growth, and aphids exhibited a feeding preference for co‐infected (relative to mock‐inoculated) plants. Our results demonstrate that virus effects on host phenotype and vector behaviour can be modified by the presence of a co‐infecting virus, with potentially important implications for disease transmission.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherBritish Ecological Societypt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceFunctional Ecologypt_BR
dc.subjectAphis glycinespt_BR
dc.subjectCo‐infectionpt_BR
dc.subjectEpilachna varivestispt_BR
dc.subjectPlant virusespt_BR
dc.subjectVector behaviourpt_BR
dc.subjectCoinfecçãopt_BR
dc.subjectVírus de plantaspt_BR
dc.subjectComportamento vetorialpt_BR
dc.titleEffects of single and mixed infections of Bean pod mottle virus and Soybean mosaic virus on host‐plant chemistry and host-vector interactionspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DEN - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.