Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item:
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/59885
Título: | Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen production methods: eucalyptus biomass gasification vs natural gas steam reforming in brazilian conditions |
Título(s) alternativo(s): | Avaliação comparativa do ciclo de vida dos métodos de produção de hidrogênio: gaseificação de biomassa de eucalipto Vs reforma a vapor de gás natural nas condições Brasileiras |
Autores: | Leme, Márcio Montagnana Vicente Leme, Márcio Montagnana Vicente Ensinas, Adriano Viana Orozco, Dimas Jose Rua Capaz, Rafael Silva |
Palavras-chave: | Biomass gasification Carbon emissions reduction Sustainable energy Energy transition CO2 capture and storage Gaseificação de biomassa Redução de emissões de carbono Energia sustentável |
Data do documento: | 19-Mar-2025 |
Editor: | Universidade Federal de Lavras |
Citação: | OUANA, Samuel Alberto. Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen production methods: eucalyptus biomass gasification vs natural gas. 86 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Ambiental) - Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, 2025. |
Resumo: | Hydrogen is increasingly recognized as a promising alternative to conventional fuels, offering significant potential to drive the energy transition and reduce carbon emissions. However, the majority of hydrogen (H2) production still depends on fossil fuel sources, highlighting the urgent need to explore more sustainable alternatives. Among these, hydrogen production through the gasification of biomass, particularly eucalyptus, has garnered considerable attention. To evaluate the environmental impacts of this approach, a life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted, comparing it to the most common method, steam methane reforming (SMR) of natural gas, under Brazilian conditions. The study assessed three distinct scenarios to provide a comprehensive analysis of their environmental performance. i) SMR of natural gas, ii) SMR-CCS - SMR integrated with carbon capture and storage (CCS), and iii) Gasification-WGS - eucalyptus gasification coupled with the water-gas shift reaction. Using ReCiPe's midpoint (H) method, nine key impact categories were analyzed, with global warming (GW) identified as the most critical. Results revealed that SMR and SMR-CCS produce 17.5 kg and 10.5 kg of CO2 equivalent emissions, respectively, while the Gasification-WGS scenario emits only 1.84 kg of CO2 equivalent, reducing emissions by approximately 89% compared to SMR. Despite its lower GW impact, the SMR-CCS scenario showed higher impacts in other categories, whereas the Gasification-WGS scenario had increased eutrophication due to nutrient runoff from eucalyptus cultivation. These findings underscore the importance of assessing hydrogen production pathways comprehensively to ensure their sustainability and environmental viability. Biomass gasification, supported by photosynthesis and CCS technologies, demonstrates significant potential as a clean energy vector in the decarbonization scenario. |
Descrição: | Arquivo retido, a pedido do autor, até março de 2026. |
URI: | http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/59885 |
Aparece nas coleções: | BU - Teses e Dissertações |
Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.
Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.