Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
metadata.revistascielo.dc.creator: Rode, Rafael
Leite, Helio Garcia
Binoti, Daniel Henrique Breda
Ribeiro, Carlos Antonio Álvares Soares
Souza, Agostinho Lopes
Cosenza, Diogo Nepomuceno
Boechat, Carlos Pedro
metadata.revistascielo.dc.subject: Forest management, Forest optimization, Rural properties, Forest owners
metadata.revistascielo.dc.publisher: CERNE
CERNE 8-Jul-2016
metadata.revistascielo.dc.description: This study aims to assess the cooperative regulation process of forestry producers in comparison to the traditional individual regulation of properties. Twenty (20) forest properties are studied as examples of the development of three forest regulation scenarios: 1) individual regulation, 2) group regulation, and 3) cooperative regulation. The Net Present Value (NPV) of each of the scenarios is optimized according to mathematical programming models and compared to a baseline scenario without forest regulation. According to the proposed cooperative regulation, properties had a proportion factor for annual net revenue distribution calculated from results of the baseline scenario. By comparing the NPV maximization results from scenarios 1 and 3 with the non-regulation scenario, the cost for individual regulation is on average 25%, while being only 11% for cooperative regulation, that is, a 14% reduction in property regulation costs. Additionally, cooperative regulation had the advantage of dividing properties into fewer areas when compared to individual regulation.
metadata.revistascielo.dc.language: eng
Appears in Collections:CERNE

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.