Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/33989
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorPauchard, Aníbal-
dc.creatorMeyerson, Laura A.-
dc.creatorBacher, Sven-
dc.creatorBlackburn, Tim M.-
dc.creatorBrundu, Giuseppe-
dc.creatorCadotte, Marc W.-
dc.creatorCourchamp, Franck-
dc.creatorEssl, Franz-
dc.creatorGenovesi, Piero-
dc.creatorHaider, Sylvia-
dc.creatorHolmes, Nick D.-
dc.creatorHulme, Philip E.-
dc.creatorJeschke, Jonathan M.-
dc.creatorLockwood, Julie L.-
dc.creatorNovoa, Ana-
dc.creatorA. Nuñez, Martin-
dc.creatorPeltzer, Duane A.-
dc.creatorPyšek, Petr-
dc.creatorRichardson, David M.-
dc.creatorSimberloff, Daniel-
dc.creatorSmith, Kevin-
dc.creatorvan Wilgen, Brian W.-
dc.creatorVilà, Montserrat-
dc.creatorWilson, John R. U.-
dc.creatorWinter, Marten-
dc.creatorZenni, Rafael D.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-03T19:54:43Z-
dc.date.available2019-05-03T19:54:43Z-
dc.date.issued2018-11-13-
dc.identifier.citationPAUCHARD, A. et al. Biodiversity assessments: origin matters. PLoS Biology, [S.l.], v. 16, n. 11, p. 1-4, Nov. 2018. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006686.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/33989-
dc.description.abstractRecent global efforts in biodiversity accounting, such as those undertaken through the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are vital if we are to track conservation progress, ensure that we can address the challenges of global change, and develop powerful and scientifically sound indicators. Schlaepfer [1] proposes that we should work toward inventories of biodiversity that account for native and non-native species regardless of species origin and ecological context. We strongly disagree with the approach of combining counts of native and non-native species because this will reduce our capacity to detect the effects of non-native species on native biodiversity with potentially devastating consequences. Compelling and abundant evidence demonstrates that some non-native species can become invasive and produce major ecosystem disruptions and even native species extinction. Unfortunately, we still cannot be certain which non-native species will be the most detrimental (e.g., [2]). Combining native and non-native species together into a single biodiversity index would not only inflate biodiversity estimates and risk promoting the spread of invasive non-native species but would also ignore the fundamental ecological differences between the two groups. The critical differences that should be considered when assessing biodiversity include the following.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherPLOSpt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rightsacesso abertopt_BR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourcePLoS Biologypt_BR
dc.subjectConservationpt_BR
dc.subjectGlobal changept_BR
dc.subjectBiodiversity inventoriespt_BR
dc.titleBiodiversity assessments: origin matterspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DBI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_Biodiversity assessments origin matters.pdf276,93 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons