Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/38691
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorGries, Rita-
dc.creatorLouzada, Julio-
dc.creatorAlmeida, Sabrina-
dc.creatorMacedo, Renan-
dc.creatorBarlow, Jos-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T11:35:52Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-27T11:35:52Z-
dc.date.issued2012-05-
dc.identifier.citationGRIES, R.; LOUZADA, J.; ALMEIDA, S.; MACEDO, R.; BARLOW, J. Evaluating the impacts and conservation value of exotic and native tree afforestation in Cerrado grasslands using dung beetles. Insect Conservation and Diversity, Oxford, v. 5, n. 3, p. 175-185, May 2012.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00145.xpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/38691-
dc.description.abstract1. Although plantation forests are being established at an increasing rate, their effects on biodiversity are still debated. 2. Native candeias [Eremanthus erythropappus (DC.) Mac Leish] and exotic eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.) have recently been planted on Cerrado grasslands. The Cerrado is the second largest biome of Brazil and one of the most threatened savanna ecosystems. 3. Here, we use dung beetles (Scarabaeinae) to investigate the effects of the land‐use changes associated to afforestation on Cerrado insect biodiversity. We sampled dung beetles in candeia (4‐ and 6‐year‐old) and eucalyptus plantations (1‐ and 4‐year‐old), natural candeia formations (candeiais), native grasslands and natural forests. 4. Dung beetle diversity in plantations was lower than in grasslands and forests, but was not different from diversity in natural candeiais. Candeia and 1‐year‐old eucalyptus plantations, grasslands and natural candeiais all had similar community composition, distinct from natural forests. Four‐year‐old eucalyptus plantations were intermediate between those two groups. Overall, afforestation was detrimental for dung beetles. 5. Differences between exotic and native plantations were only apparent in older plantations, and seemed to be due to differences associated to canopy openness rather than to the origin of the planted species. Candeia plantations were of better conservation value for open‐area species (62% species shared between grasslands and candeia plantation) whereas eucalyptus plantations were so for forest species (26% species shared between forests and eucalyptus plantations). We recommend considering this result before deciding where to plant which species.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherThe Royal Entomological Societypt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceInsect Conservation and Diversitypt_BR
dc.subjectLand‐use changept_BR
dc.subjectReforestationpt_BR
dc.subjectMudança no uso da terrapt_BR
dc.subjectReflorestamentopt_BR
dc.titleEvaluating the impacts and conservation value of exotic and native tree afforestation in Cerrado grasslands using dung beetlespt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DBI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.