Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/40075
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorOliveira, Dâmiany Pádua-
dc.creatorPereira, Thiago de Assis-
dc.creatorRufini, Márcia-
dc.creatorMartins, Fábio Aurélio Dias-
dc.creatorSilva Junior, Celso Leandro da-
dc.creatorBaptista, Maria Vitória Batista Duque Guttierrez-
dc.creatorSilva, Jacqueline Savana da-
dc.creatorOliveira, Priscilla Águida Cassiano de-
dc.creatorAragão, Osnar Obede da Silva-
dc.creatorAndrade, Messias José Bastos de-
dc.creatorMoreira, Fatima Maria de Souza-
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-15T17:42:06Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-15T17:42:06Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-
dc.identifier.citationOLIVEIRA, D. P. et al. Liquid inoculation with rhizobia in the planting furrow of common bean under no‐till is feasible under different soil and climatic conditions. Crop Science, [S. l.], v. 59, n. 5, p. 2178-2181, Sept./Oct. 2019.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2135/cropsci2018.08.0522pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/40075-
dc.description.abstractCommon bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) producers that have adopted a high level of technology have shown interest in the use of liquid inoculant in the planting furrow, especially because of the practicality of this operation in large‐scale planting operations. However, consistent information on this practice is lacking for common bean, which requires studies to assist the producer in the choice of the inoculation method to be adopted and in determination of the application rates adequate for good performance of biological N2 fixation. To that end, two field experiments were conducted under the no‐till system under different soil and climatic conditions, both of them in irrigated areas. A randomized block experimental design was used, with four replications and seven treatments (three rates of liquid inoculation in the planting furrow; peat‐based or liquid inoculation on the seed; and two control treatments without inoculation, without and with N‐urea). The cultivar used was BRSMG Madrepérola and the rhizobial strain was CIAT 899 (±109 cells of Rhizobium tropici per milliliter or gram). Inoculation on the seed was performed shortly before sowing. Inoculation in the planting furrow at the rate of 3.5 L ha−1 not only leads to higher yields than inoculations on the seed but also ensures bean seed yields equivalent to those of the treatment with mineral N. Therefore, due to operational practicality, inoculation in the planting furrow is the most advantageous of the inoculations tested, regardless of the soil and climatic conditions in this study.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherWileypt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceCrop Sciencept_BR
dc.subjectRhizobiapt_BR
dc.subjectBiological nitrogen fixationpt_BR
dc.subjectFixação biológica de nitrogêniopt_BR
dc.titleLiquid inoculation with rhizobia in the planting furrow of common bean under no‐till is feasible under different soil and climatic conditionspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DCS - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.