Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/42950
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorHastie, Claire E.-
dc.creatorMackay, Daniel F.-
dc.creatorHo, Frederick-
dc.creatorCelis-Morales, Carlos A.-
dc.creatorKatikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal-
dc.creatorNiedzwiedz, Claire L.-
dc.creatorJani, Bhautesh D.-
dc.creatorWelsh, Paul-
dc.creatorMair, Frances S.-
dc.creatorGray, Stuart R.-
dc.creatorO’Donnell, Catherine A.-
dc.creatorGill, Jason M. R.-
dc.creatorSattar, Naveed-
dc.creatorPell, Jill P.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-09T13:20:09Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-09T13:20:09Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationHASTIE, C. E. et al. Vitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK Biobank. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews, [S.l.], v. 14, n. 4, p. 561-565, July/Aug. 2020.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871402120301156pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/42950-
dc.description.abstractBackground and aims COVID-19 and low levels of vitamin D appear to disproportionately affect black and minority ethnic individuals. We aimed to establish whether blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration was associated with COVID-19 risk, and whether it explained the higher incidence of COVID-19 in black and South Asian people. Methods UK Biobank recruited 502,624 participants aged 37–73 years between 2006 and 2010. Baseline exposure data, including 25(OH)D concentration and ethnicity, were linked to COVID-19 test results. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for the association between 25(OH)D and confirmed COVID-19, and the association between ethnicity and both 25(OH)D and COVID-19. Results Complete data were available for 348,598 UK Biobank participants. Of these, 449 had confirmed COVID-19 infection. Vitamin D was associated with COVID-19 infection univariably (OR = 0.99; 95% CI 0.99–0.999; p = 0.013), but not after adjustment for confounders (OR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.998–1.01; p = 0.208). Ethnicity was associated with COVID-19 infection univariably (blacks versus whites OR = 5.32, 95% CI = 3.68–7.70, p-value<0.001; South Asians versus whites OR = 2.65, 95% CI = 1.65–4.25, p-value<0.001). Adjustment for 25(OH)D concentration made little difference to the magnitude of the association. Conclusions Our findings do not support a potential link between vitamin D concentrations and risk of COVID-19 infection, nor that vitamin D concentration may explain ethnic differences in COVID-19 infection.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceDiabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviewspt_BR
dc.subjectCOVID-19pt_BR
dc.subjectVitamin Dpt_BR
dc.subjectEthnicitypt_BR
dc.titleVitamin D concentrations and COVID-19 infection in UK Biobankpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:FCS - Artigos sobre Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.