Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/48053
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorAndrade, Renata-
dc.creatorSilva, Sérgio Henrique Godinho-
dc.creatorFaria, Wilson Missina-
dc.creatorPoggere, Giovana Clarice-
dc.creatorBarbosa, Julierme Zimmer-
dc.creatorGuilherme, Luiz Roberto Guimarães-
dc.creatorCuri, Nilton-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-06T17:15:43Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-06T17:15:43Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.citationANDRADE, R. et al. Proximal sensing applied to soil texture prediction and mapping in Brazil. Geoderma Regional, [S. l.], v. 23, e00321, Dec. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00321.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00321pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/48053-
dc.description.abstractProximal sensors techniques, such as portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometry and magnetic susceptibility (MS), are becoming increasingly popular for predicting soil properties worldwide. However, there are few studies investigating the effectiveness of combining these proximal sensors for prediction and mapping soil texture in tropical soils. This work evaluated the feasibility of combining such sensors for the prediction and mapping of soil texture (sand, silt, and clay contents) through random forest algorithm in an area with varying parent materials, soil classes and land uses. A total of 236 soil samples were collected from A and B horizons, following a regular-grid design with 200 m distance between samples. All samples were scanned with pXRF and susceptibilimeter. Models for A and B horizons separately and combined were built using 70% of the samples and validated with the remaining 30% of the samples. The models with the lowest RMSE values were chosen for soil mapping and further validation. The predictions produced acceptable accuracy in modeling and mapping clay and sand fractions, but were less effective to directly predict silt fraction, although it can be easily calculated through: silt = 100 - sand – clay. MS, Fe, K2O, and SiO2, properties related to soil parent material, were the most important variables for the predictions. The best models achieved an R2 for sand, silt and clay of 0.79, 0.44 and 0.71, respectively. These results represent alternative methods for reducing costs and accelerating the assessment of soil texture spatial variability, supporting agronomic and environmental decision makings.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceGeoderma Regionalpt_BR
dc.subjectPedometricspt_BR
dc.subjectOxisolspt_BR
dc.subjectUltisolspt_BR
dc.subjectRandom forestpt_BR
dc.subjectDigital soil mappingpt_BR
dc.subjectTropical soilspt_BR
dc.subjectPedometriapt_BR
dc.subjectLatossolospt_BR
dc.subjectArgissolospt_BR
dc.subjectMapeamento digital do solopt_BR
dc.titleProximal sensing applied to soil texture prediction and mapping in Brazilpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DCS - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.