Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/48506
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorPego, Matheus Felipe Freire-
dc.creatorBianchi, Maria Lúcia-
dc.creatorYasumura, Patrícia Kaji-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T20:18:40Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-18T20:18:40Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.citationPEGO, M. F. F.; BIANCHI, M. L.; YASUMURA, P. K. Nanocellulose reinforcement in paper produced from fiber blending. Wood Science and Technology, [S. I.], v. 54, p. 1587-1603, Nov. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-020-01226-w.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-020-01226-wpt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/48506-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of nanocellulose addition on the physical–mechanical properties of the paper produced from different fiber blends, besides comparing two nanocellulose addition methods. Three different fibers were used for fiber blending (eucalyptus, sisal, and pine). Handsheets were formed based on the mixing of all possible combinations at a 45/55 ratio in 2% consistency and 60 g/m2. Handsheet reinforcements were performed by two methods: The mixture method (MT) was a mixture of nanocellulose along with pulp during paper formation in 3, 5, and 10% addition; the coating method (CT) was the superficial coating of dry formed papers in 10% addition. Nanocellulose was produced by mechanical microfibrillation of sisal pulp. Handsheets were evaluated by physical and strength properties. Nanocellulose addition increased thickness, volume, grammage, apparent density, opacity, roughness, tensile strength, tensile index, stretch, bursting index, tear index, and fold endurance by 8.7, 8.8, 10.4, 2.1, 4.1, 23.2, 45.7, 31.8, 20.1, 14.2, 21.1, and 271.6% but reduced bulk, brightness, and air permeance by 1.9, 3.4, and 71.7%, respectively. The reinforcement methods presented distinct results. In physical properties, an increasing tendency toward nanocellulose (MT) increase was observed in thickness, grammage, and apparent density despite the decreasing trend in air permeance. No tendency was observed in other physical properties. In general, CT presented higher values of thickness, grammage, bulk, and brightness but lower values of apparent density and opacity, compared to MT. The mixture method showed an increasing tendency in strength properties with the increase of nanocellulose content. CT obtained fewer strength properties compared to MT.pt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherSpringer Naturept_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceWood Science and Technologypt_BR
dc.subjectPaper - Qualitypt_BR
dc.subjectNanocellulosept_BR
dc.subjectPaper - Resistancept_BR
dc.subjectPaper - Physical–mechanical propertiespt_BR
dc.subjectReinforcement methodspt_BR
dc.subjectPapel - Qualidadept_BR
dc.subjectNanocelulosept_BR
dc.subjectPapel - Resistênciapt_BR
dc.subjectPapel - Propriedades físico-mecânicaspt_BR
dc.subjectMétodos de reforçopt_BR
dc.titleNanocellulose reinforcement in paper produced from fiber blendingpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DQI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.