Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/57772
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorCosta, Anna Cecília Trolesi Reis Borges-
dc.creatorColocho, Raisa Abreu Bragança-
dc.creatorPereira, Carine Rodrigues-
dc.creatorLage, Andrey Pereira-
dc.creatorHeinemann, Marcos Bryan-
dc.creatorDorneles, Elaine Maria Seles-
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-12T20:23:33Z-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-27T19:56:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-12T20:23:33Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-27T19:56:55Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.citationCOSTA, A. C. T. R. B. et al. Canine leptospirosis in stray and sheltered dogs: a systematic review. Animal Health Research Reviews, Cambridge, p. 1-20, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252321000190.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S1466252321000190pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/57772-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this systematic review was to investigate the prevalence of leptospirosis among stray and sheltered dogs worldwide. Six databases were searched, which resulted in the retrieval of 476 articles. Sixty articles were selected for analysis according to 10 quality criteria. Among the selected papers, 26 papers [43.4% (26/60)] met five of the 10 quality criteria established, 10 papers [16.7% (10/60)] met three criteria, nine papers [15.0% (9/60)] met four criteria, six papers [10.0% (6/60)] met six criteria, four papers [6.7% (4/60)] met eight criteria, and three papers [5.0% (3/60)] met nine of the 10 criteria, whereas two papers [1.7% (1/60)] met two and seven [1.7% (1/60)] criteria. Publications originated mainly from the Americas [45.0% (27/60)] and in the last 16 years (2003–2019) [81.7% (49/60)], and most of the sampled dogs were stray dogs [65.0% (39/60)]. The most commonly used diagnostic test for leptospirosis was the microscopic agglutination test [78.4% (47/60)] followed by polymerase chain reaction [21.7% (13/60)], and the most common serovars were Canicola [71.4% (35/49)], Icterohaemorrhagiae [65.3% (32/49)], Grippotyphosa [40.8% (20/49)], and Pomona [40.8% (20/49)]. In conclusion, our results showed that Leptospira spp. are present in unowned dogs worldwide; however, the low-methodological quality of the recovered cross-sectional studies precluded a meta-analysis.pt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherCambridge University Presspt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceAnimal Health Research Reviewspt_BR
dc.subjectCross-sectionalpt_BR
dc.subjectEpidemiologypt_BR
dc.subjectLeptospirapt_BR
dc.subjectSeroprevalencept_BR
dc.subjectStreet dogspt_BR
dc.subjectUnowned dogspt_BR
dc.subjectCães - Doenças infecciosaspt_BR
dc.subjectEpidemiologiapt_BR
dc.subjectLeptospirosept_BR
dc.subjectSoroprevalênciapt_BR
dc.subjectCães de ruapt_BR
dc.titleCanine leptospirosis in stray and sheltered dogs: a systematic reviewpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DMV - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.