Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/57937
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorMartinolli, Matteo-
dc.creatorBortolini, Sergio-
dc.creatorNatali, Alfredo-
dc.creatorPereira, Luciano José-
dc.creatorCastelo, Paula Midori-
dc.creatorGarcia, Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues-
dc.creatorGonçalves, Thais Marques Simek Vega-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-08T17:28:52Z-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-27T19:57:49Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-08T17:28:52Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-27T19:57:49Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-
dc.identifier.citationMARTINOLLI, M. et al. Long‐term survival analysis of standard‐length and short implants with multifunctional abutments. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, [S.I.], v. 46, n. 7, p. 640-646, Jul. 2019.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/joor.12791pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/57937-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Spherical shape and connecting bypass screw of the OT Equator abutment (Rhein83, Italy) provides several retentive possibilities, even in non‐parallel implants. Objective: This study assessed the long‐term survival of standard‐length and short implants receiving this multifunctional abutment. Methods: Partially, edentulous patients (44 males and 64 females) (mean age 58.2 ± 10.5 years) rehabilitated with a fixed implant‐supported prosthesis where the OT Equator abutments (Rhein83) were applied. Follow‐up evaluations were performed up to 5 years following prosthesis delivery. Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to determine whether the distribution of time to failure differed based on implant characteristics (length and region), adjusting for sex (α = 0.05). Results: In total, 216 implants (5 × 8 mm, n = 126; 5 × 6 mm, n = 90) (Betwice, Mech & Human, Italy) were installed. The average follow‐up period was 25.3 months (±19.3 months). Eight failures occurred, with most observed before loading (n = 6). Cumulative survival rates (CSR) at implant and abutment levels were 94.3% and 97.1%, respectively. Regarding implant length, CSRs were 97.8% and 90.6% for short and standard‐length implants, respectively, with no difference between subgroups (logrank: χ2 = 1.34, df = 1, P = 0.25). No significant difference was also found between implants of maxilla (CSR = 92.2%) and mandible (CSR = 95.5%; logrank: χ2 = 0.08, df = 1, P = 0.78). Conclusion: The OT Equator abutment (Rhein83) showed a stable clinical performance, with continuous and predictable survival.pt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherWiley Online Librarypt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceJournal of Oral Rehabilitationpt_BR
dc.subjectClinical trialpt_BR
dc.subjectDental abutmentpt_BR
dc.subjectDental implantspt_BR
dc.subjectKaplan‐Meier analysispt_BR
dc.subjectSurvival analysispt_BR
dc.subjectEnsaio clínicopt_BR
dc.subjectPilar dentáriopt_BR
dc.subjectImplantes dentáriospt_BR
dc.subjectAnálise de Kaplan-Meierpt_BR
dc.subjectAnálise de sobrevivênciapt_BR
dc.titleLong‐term survival analysis of standard‐length and short implants with multifunctional abutmentspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DMV - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.