Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/58062
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorCoelho, Rosamara S.-
dc.creatorPec, Marvin-
dc.creatorSilva, Ana L. Rodrigues-
dc.creatorPeñaflor, Maria F. G. V.-
dc.creatorMarucci, Rosangela C.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-05T16:05:10Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-05T16:05:10Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-02-
dc.identifier.citationCOELHO, R. S. et al. Predation potential of the earwig on fruit fly larvae and trophic interactions with the parasitoid. Journal of Applied Entomology, [S.l.], v. 147, n. 2, p. 147-156, Mar. 2023. DOI: 10.1111/jen.13091.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jen.13091pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/58062-
dc.description.abstractThe earwig Euborellia annulipes (Lucas) (Dermaptera: Anisolabididae), a generalist predator, has been observed in fruits infested with fruit fly larvae, which are frequently parasitized by parasitoid wasps. Neither the capacity of earwigs to predate on fruit flies nor intraguild interactions between earwigs and fruit fly parasitoids have been investigated. Here, we studied in laboratory conditions the predation on the fruit fly Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) by the earwig E. annulipes, and whether parasitism of fruit fly larvae by the parasitoid wasp Diachasmimorpha longicaudata (Ashmead) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) influences predation by the earwig. We evaluated the predation capacity, functional response and prey preference of E. annulipes for parasitized and non-parasitized fruit fly larvae in choice and no-choice tests. We found that earwigs prey on second- and third-instar larvae and pupae of C. capitata and consumed larger numbers of second-instar larvae, followed by third-instar larvae and pupae. Females prey on larger numbers of fruit flies than did males, regardless of the prey developmental stage, but both sexes exhibited a type II functional response. Interestingly, males killed but did not consume fruit fly larvae more than did females. In no-choice tests, earwig females consumed equal numbers of parasitized and non-parasitized fruit fly larvae. However, in choice tests, the females avoided feeding on parasitized larvae. Subsequent tests with hexane-washed parasitized and non-parasitized larvae showed that putative chemical markings left on fruit flies by parasitoids did not drive the earwig preference towards non-parasitized larvae. These findings suggest that E. annulipes is a potential biological control agent for C. capitata, and that, because the earwig avoids consuming larvae parasitized by D. longicaudata, a combination of the two natural enemies could have an additive effect on pest mortality.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherWileypt_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceJournal of Applied Entomologypt_BR
dc.subjectBiological controlpt_BR
dc.subjectFunctional responsept_BR
dc.subjectIntraguild predationpt_BR
dc.subjectPredatory capacitypt_BR
dc.subjectEarwigpt_BR
dc.subjectCeratitispt_BR
dc.titlePredation potential of the earwig on fruit fly larvae and trophic interactions with the parasitoidpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DEN - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.