Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/33027
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorRabelo, Carlos Henrique Silveira-
dc.creatorHärter, Carla Joice-
dc.creatorÁvila, Carla Luiza da Silva-
dc.creatorReis, Ricardo Andrade-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-25T17:48:56Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-25T17:48:56Z-
dc.date.issued2019-01-
dc.identifier.citationRABELO, C. H. S. et al. Meta‐analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation, chemical composition and aerobic stability of sugarcane silage. Grassland Science, Tochigi, v. 65, n. 1, p. 3-12, Jan. 2019.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/grs.12215pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/33027-
dc.description.abstractWe conducted a meta‐analysis to investigate the impact of Lactobacillus plantarum or Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation, chemical composition, and aerobic stability of sugarcane silage. Two databases that included 15 and 27 published articles (81 and 83 silages evaluated) were used to evaluate L. plantarum and L. buchneri, respectively. For each database, the means of the treatments compiled from the studies were classified into two categories: (a) sugarcane silage without inoculant (untreated) and (b) sugarcane silage inoculated with L. plantarum (1 × 105–1.8 × 106 cfu/g of fresh forage) or with L. buchneri (2.5 × 104–1 × 106 cfu/g of fresh forage; inoculated). Sugarcane silage inoculated with L. plantarum displayed increased ethanol concentration (+43.8%, p < 0.01) and dry matter (DM) loss (+9.6%, p = 0.03). In contrast, inoculation with L. buchneri increased the acetic acid concentration (+30.8%, p = 0.01), and decreased ethanol concentration (−58.8%, p < 0.01) and DM loss (−19.7%, p < 0.01). In vitro DM digestibility decreased following inoculation with L. plantarum (−5.7%, p = 0.05) or L. buchneri (−3.3%, p < 0.01). Aerobic stability was unaffected by inoculation with L. plantarum (p = 0.16) or L. buchneri (p = 0.48). The results show that L. plantarum impairs the fermentation of sugarcane silages; therefore, its utilization might not be recommended for ensiling this crop. Conversely, even with no additional gain on silage digestibility and aerobic stability, L. buchneri may be recommended for sugarcane ensiling because it reduces alcoholic fermentation and DM loss.pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherJapanese Society of Grassland Sciencept_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceGrassland Sciencept_BR
dc.subjectDry matter losspt_BR
dc.subjectLactobacillus buchneript_BR
dc.subjectLactobacillus plantarumpt_BR
dc.subjectSugarcane - Silagept_BR
dc.subjectPerda de matéria secapt_BR
dc.subjectCana de Açúcar - Silagempt_BR
dc.titleMeta‐analysis of the effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation, chemical composition and aerobic stability of sugarcane silagept_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DZO - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.