Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/39566
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creatorPeixoto, Devison Souza-
dc.creatorSilva, Bruno Montoani-
dc.creatorKarlen, Douglas L.-
dc.creatorMoreira, Silvino Guimarães-
dc.creatorSilva, Alessandro Alvarenga Pereira da-
dc.creatorResende, Álvaro Vilela de-
dc.creatorNorton, Lloyd Darrell-
dc.creatorCuri, Nilton-
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-31T12:04:43Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-31T12:04:43Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationPEIXOTO, D. S. et al. Diagnosing, ameliorating, and monitoring soil compaction in no-till brazilian soils. Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-14, 2019.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/56557566-
dc.description.abstractSoil compaction can significantly reduce crop yield. Our objective was to identify the most sensitive soil physical property and process indicators related to crop yield using a Random Forest algorithm (RFA). This machine-learning, decision-making tool was used with field-scale data from five soil management treatments designed to ameliorate compaction in no-tillage (NT) fields. The treatments were: T1, NT for 10 yr (control); T2, NT with surface application of 3.6 Mg ha-1 of agricultural gypsum; T3, NT with subsoiling plus 1.44 Mg ha-1 of highly reactive limestone applied to a depth of 0.60 m; T4, NT planting following chisel plowing at a depth of 0.26 m; and T5, NT with subsoiling to a depth of 0.60 m plus 1.44 Mg ha-1 of surface-applied, highly reactive limestone. Fifteen soil physical properties and processes related to growth and yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were measured. Mechanical intervention, specifically subsoiling, improved soil physical properties and increased soybean yield cultivated following occasional tillage. The RFA ranked penetration resistance (PR), air capacity, macroporosity, relative field capacity, and the Dexter-S index as the most sensitive soil physical indicators affecting soybean yield. Those indicators were also sensitive to changes in soil structure due to subsoiling. We conclude that the RFA was an effective tool for screening indicators and that those chosen can be effective for monitoring soil compaction and its effect on soybean yield. Penetration resistance may be used to guide on-farm decision-making regarding when and how NT soil compaction should be addressedpt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherWileypt_BR
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rightsacesso abertopt_BR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceAgrosystems, Geosciences & Environmentpt_BR
dc.titleDiagnosing, ameliorating, and monitoring soil compaction in no-till brazilian soilspt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR
Appears in Collections:DAG - Artigos publicados em periódicos
DCS - Artigos publicados em periódicos



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons