Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/49165
Título: Predicción del umbral anaeróbicoen elejercicio prensa de piernas a 45°
Título(s) alternativo(s): Prediction ofthe anaerobic threshold in the leg press 45° exercise
Palavras-chave: Fisiología del ejercicio
Umbral aeróbico
Umbral anaeróbico
Transición aeróbica-anaeróbica
Exercise physiology
Aerobic threshold
Anaerobic threshold
Aerobic-anaerobic transition
Data do documento: 2021
Editor: RIMCAFD
Citação: CAMPOS, Y. A. C. et al. Predicción del umbral anaeróbicoen elejercicio prensa de piernas a 45°. Revista Internacional De Medicina Y Ciencias De La Actividad Física Y Del Deporte, [S. l.], v. 21, n. 81, p. 83-97, 2021. DOI: 10.15366/rimcafd2021.81.006.
Resumo: Objective: Identify the anaerobic threshold (AnT) through blood lactate concentrations (LTDmax) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) by the Dmax method (RPETDmax), and evaluate the correlation between these methods.Methods: Sixteen male long-distance runners participated in the study. Participants performed a gradual incremental test in leg press 45° exercise collecting blood lactate concentrations and perceived exertion. A student’s T-test was performed to compare the intensity of exercise in which the LTDmax and RPETDmax were found, and a Pearson test was applied to verify the correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: No significant difference was foundbetween the LTDmax and RPETDmax(p<0.05). In addition, a strong correlation (r=0.73) and high ICC (0.822) were observed between them. Conclusions: For the sample studied,it was possible to determine the AnT through the kinetics of RPE.
URI: https://doi.org/10.15366/rimcafd2021.81.006
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/49165
Aparece nas coleções:DEF - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Não existem arquivos associados a este item.


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.