Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/49344
Title: | Evaluation of geomorphological approaches combined with digital elevation models for the Nash's instantaneous unit hydrograph |
Keywords: | Direct surface runoff Watershed Floods Hydrology Remote sensing Escoamento superficial Bacia hidrográfica Inundações Hidrologia Sensoriamento remoto |
Issue Date: | Apr-2021 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Citation: | MOURA, M. M. de et al. Evaluation of geomorphological approaches combined with digital elevation models for the Nash's instantaneous unit hydrograph. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, [S.I.], v. 107, Apr. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.103153. |
Abstract: | Methodologies for estimation of direct surface runoff (DSR) hydrographs have been proposed, especially for the Unit Hydrograph (UH) and Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (IUH). The widely used IUH developed by Nash (NIUH) has two main parameters: number of reservoirs (n) and storage coefficient (k), which by definition are determined based on observed rainfall-runoff events. In order to overcome the need for hydrological data for application of NIUH, geomorphological approaches (GAs) have been developed to provide the aforementioned parameters for ungauged watersheds, thus allowing for the estimation of DSR hydrographs using only relief information. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of 4 GAs (GA1 - Nash, 1960; GA2 - Wu, 1963; GA3 - Rosso, 1984; GA4 - Bhaskar et al., 1997). Moreover, this study sought to investigate the influence of different digital elevation models (DEMs) (TOPO, ASTER, SRTM-30 and SRTM-90) on the determination of geomorphological attributes necessary for the application of the above-mentioned GAs. Twenty rainfall-runoff events observed in a small Brazilian watershed were used to evaluate the performance of NIUH combined with different GAs and DEMs for estimation of DSR hydrographs. In view of the results found in this study, the main conclusions are: i) the GAs exert more influence on the parameters n and k than the DEMs; ii) GA1 and GA2 outperformed GA3 and GA4; and iii) GA2 coupled with the ASTER DEM results in the best estimates of DSR hydrographs. |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.103153 http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/49344 |
Appears in Collections: | DEG - Artigos publicados em periódicos |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.