Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/58927
Title: | Microbial oil and biodiesel production in an integrated sugarcane biorefinery: Techno-economic and life cycle assessment |
Keywords: | Bioethanol Bioetanol Biodiesel Microbial oil Óleo microbiano Rhodotorula toruloides Product life cicle Ciclo de vida do produto |
Issue Date: | Dec-2022 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
Citation: | LONGATI, A. A. et al. Microbial oil and biodiesel production in an integrated sugarcane biorefinery: Techno-economic and life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, Amsterdam, v. 379, pt. 2, Dec. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134487. |
Abstract: | Biodiesel and bioethanol play an important role as renewable liquid fuels. Bagasse, a by-product from the bioethanol industry, can generate a “sugarcane bagasse hemicellulose hydrolysate” (SCBH) that contains fermentable sugars, mainly xylose. Oleaginous yeasts (eg., Rhodotorula toruloides) can grow in SCBH, producing microbial oil (MO), a source of triacylglycerol for biodiesel production. The integration of bioethanol and biodiesel (from MO) production may be a promising approach in order to exploit synergies between bioethanol and biodiesel processes within a biorefinery. This integration may improve the economic and environmental performance of both processes. This work presents the techno-economic-environmental analysis of the integrated production of first-generation bioethanol, bioelectricity, and biodiesel in a Brazilian sugarcane biorefinery, where MO from the yeast R. toruloides feeds the biodiesel unit. The biorefinery, processing 4.0 million t of sugarcane per harvest, produces 71.7 m3/h of bioethanol, 2.55 m3/h of biodiesel (that can replace 75.6% of the diesel demand in the field), and 86.3 MW of surplus bioelectricity. A life cycle assessment shows that the integrated biorefinery had a lower environmental impact than the first-generation bioethanol plant. The integrated process exhibits a positive economic performance (net present value of approx. 110 million of dollars and internal rate of return of about 14.5% per year, higher than the minimum acceptable rate of return, assumed as 11% per year), indicating that this is a feasible industrial option. Sensitivity analysis shows that R&D should mainly focus on the MO bioreactor operation. |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134487 http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/58927 |
Appears in Collections: | DEG - Artigos publicados em periódicos |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.