Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/14924
metadata.revistascielo.dc.title: Comparative study of three forestland assessment methods
metadata.revistascielo.dc.creator: Silva, Márcio Lopes da
Rocha, Renata Rodrigues de Castro
Cordeiro, Sidney Araujo
Silva, Mayra Luiza Marques da
Bezerra, Adham Ferreira
metadata.revistascielo.dc.subject: Forestry economy
Productive value
Market value
Cost value
metadata.revistascielo.dc.publisher: Universidade Federal de Lavras
metadata.revistascielo.dc.date: 4-May-2015
metadata.revistascielo.dc.identifier.citation: SILVA, M. L. da et al. Comparative study of three forestland assessment methods. Cerne, Lavras, v. 17, n. 2, 2011.
metadata.revistascielo.dc.description.resumo: Given the increasingly frequent practice of forest stand establishment in rural properties, with a steadily rising number of properties becoming home to forest crops, there is a pressing need to improve property assessment methodologies, as more and more crops will be entering the market. The objective of this work is thus to perform a comparative study of three methods of forestland assessment: market value, cost value and productive value. To that end, an eucalyptus stand with a 7-year final cutting cycle was considered. Results showed a substantial difference among methods. Market value provided greater variation with the advancing of forest age, equaling productive value toward the end of the cycle. In year 0, market value provided the lowest values, while in year 7 cost value provided the lowest values. Further and more specific research and studies should be performed to obtain more specific methodologies to value this type of rural property and all of its peculiarities.
metadata.revistascielo.dc.identifier: http://www.cerne.ufla.br/site/index.php/CERNE/article/view/35
metadata.revistascielo.dc.language: por
Appears in Collections:CERNE

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.