Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/59127
Título: A crítica da razão pura e o projeto da metafísica como ciência
Título(s) alternativo(s): The critique of pure reason and the project of metaphysics as a science
Autores: Tredanaro, Emanuele
Tredanaro, Emanuele
Leite, Patrícia Maria Kauark
Orsini, Frederico
Palavras-chave: Kant, Immanuel, 1724-1804
Filosofia transcendental
Sistema (Filosofia)
Arquitetônica
Transcendental philosophy
System (Philosophy)
Architectonic
Data do documento: 16-Mai-2024
Editor: Universidade Federal de Lavras
Citação: SILVA, E. F. da. A crítica da razão pura e o projeto da metafísica como ciência. 2024. 151 p. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia)–Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, 2024.
Resumo: The purpose of this study is to investigate and clarify the argumentation by which Kant proposes an approach to metaphysics that can be considered as science. To do this, we seek to rely on an interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason that emphasizes the role of metaphysics in his project, as opposed to a reading that highlights the role of the work as a foundation for scientific knowledge. Within this approach, we aim to identify three criteria that Kant defines as indispensable for metaphysics to be recognized as science. We demonstrate how the philosopher addresses each of these criteria, simultaneously conducting a critique of rationalist metaphysics. The first criterion concerns the necessity for metaphysics, as a science, to define the specificity of its knowledge, which Kant identifies as pure knowledge. We highlight Kant's critique of the lack of definition of metaphysical knowledge by the rationalists, as well as the need for separation between pure knowledge and sensible knowledge. The second criterion establishes that a science needs to constitute a synthetic a priori knowledge. When addressing this criterion, Kant makes several criticisms of rationalist metaphysics and the blind confidence it maintained in the principle of non-contradiction as a criterion for grounding the real possibility of a concept or judgment. We also discuss the role of mathematics as a model science and how Kant seeks to distinguish his type of knowledge from metaphysical knowledge. The third criterion establishes that metaphysics needs to be a system. Thus, we highlight the role of the “Architectonic”, a chapter where Kant presents his conception of system. We explore how metaphysics needs a unifying concept that provides unity to its body of knowledge and demonstrates its direction towards practical philosophy. Metaphysics is seen as a system of all systems that guides other sciences with a practical purpose. Finally, we compare the system of metaphysics designed by Kant with the Critique of Pure Reason itself. We argue that, although the work is a doctrine of method for metaphysics, it is already, in part, the realization of this metaphysics itself. Thus, metaphysics as the science that Kant seeks to ground in the Critique is already partially achieved through this grounding.
URI: http://repositorio.ufla.br/jspui/handle/1/59127
Aparece nas coleções:Filosofia - Mestrado (Dissertações)

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
DISSERTAÇÃO_A crítica da razão pura e o projeto da metafísica como ciência.pdf1,67 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons