Artigo

Effect of host egg age on preference, development and arrestment of Telenomus remus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae)

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura

Notas

Data

Orientadores

Editores

Coorientadores

Membros de banca

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Institute of Entomology

Faculdade, Instituto ou Escola

Departamento

Programa de Pós-Graduação

Agência de fomento

Tipo de impacto

Áreas Temáticas da Extensão

Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável

Dados abertos

Resumo

Abstract

Age of host eggs can be a limiting factor for egg parasitoids. It is expected that old eggs are less preferred by egg parasitoids, which can discriminate between eggs of different ages by using chemical cues. The objective of this study was to determine the preference, development and arrestment of Telenomus remus Nixon (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) parasitizing Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) eggs of different ages. This egg parasitoid preferred to parasitize 1- and 2-day-old eggs rather than 3-day-old eggs in choice and no-choice assays. However, although the percentage emergence of parasitoids is significantly lower from 2- and 3-day-old eggs, the sex ratio and developmental time are unaffected. Parasitoids spent longer searching substrates impregnated with extracts of 1- and 2-day old eggs than 3-day-old eggs. Our results reveal that T. remus is able to distinguish the most suitable (1-day-old) from the least suitable (3-day-old) host eggs, but unable to recognize the unsuitability of intermediate aged eggs. Egg arrestants may be responsible for the preference of T. remus for ovipositing in 1- and 2-day old eggs.

Descrição

Área de concentração

Linha de pesquisa

Agência de desenvolvimento

Palavra chave

Marca

Objetivo

Procedência

Impacto da pesquisa

Resumen

ISBN

DOI

Citação

PEÑAFLOR, M. F. G. V. et al. Effect of host egg age on preference, development and arrestment of Telenomus remus (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae). European Journal of Entomology, Branišovská, v. 109, n. 1, p. 15-20, 2012.

Link externo

Avaliação

Revisão

Suplementado Por

Referenciado Por