Attitudes of food consumers at universities towards recycling human urine as crop fertiliser: a multinational survey dataset

dc.creatorBarton, Melissa A.
dc.creatorSimha, Prithvi
dc.creatorMagri, Maria Elisa
dc.creatorDutta, Shanta
dc.creatorKabir, Humayun
dc.creatorSelvakumar, Albert
dc.creatorZhou, Xiaoqin
dc.creatorLv, Yaping
dc.creatorMartin, Tristan
dc.creatorKizos, Thanasis
dc.creatorTriantafyllou, Efthimia
dc.creatorKataki, Rupam
dc.creatorGerchman, Yoram
dc.creatorHerscu-Kluska, Ronit
dc.creatorAlrousan, Dheaya
dc.creatorDalahmeh, Sahar
dc.creatorGoh, Eng Giap
dc.creatorElenciuc, Daniela
dc.creatorGłowacka, Aleksandra
dc.creatorKorculanin, Laura
dc.creatorTzeng, Rongyu Veneta
dc.creatorRay, Saikat Sinha
dc.creatorGanesapillai, Mahesh
dc.creatorNiwagaba, Charles
dc.creatorProuty, Christine
dc.creatorMihelcic, James R.
dc.creatorVinnerås, Björn
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-21T19:04:51Z
dc.date.available2022-06-21T19:04:51Z
dc.date.issued2021-04
dc.description.abstractWe present here a data set generated from a multinational survey on opinions of university community members on the prospect of consuming food grown with human urine as fertiliser and about their urine recycling perceptions in general. The data set comprises answers from 3,763 university community members (students, faculty/researchers, and staff) from 20 universities in 16 countries and includes demographic variables (age bracket, gender, type of settlement of origin, academic discipline, and role in the university). Questions were designed based on Ajzen's theory of planned behaviour to elicit information about three components of behavioural intention—attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control. Survey questions covered perceived risks and benefits (attitudes), perceptions of colleagues (injunctive social norm) and willingness to consume food grown with cow urine/faeces (descriptive social norm), and willingness to pay a price premium for food grown with human urine as fertiliser (perceived behavioural control). We also included a question about acceptable urine recycling and disposal options and assessed general environmental outlook via the 15-item revised New Ecological Paradigm (NEP) scale. Data were collected through a standardised survey instrument translated into the relevant languages and then administered via an online form. Invitations to the survey were sent by email to university mailing lists or to a systematic sample of the university directory. Only a few studies on attitudes towards using human urine as fertiliser have been conducted previously. The data described here, which we analysed in “Willingness among food consumers at universities to recycle human urine as crop fertiliser: Evidence from a multinational survey” [1], may be used to further understand potential barriers to acceptance of new sanitation systems based on wastewater source separation and urine recycling and can help inform the design of future sociological studies.pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationBARTON, M. A. et al. Attitudes of food consumers at universities towards recycling human urine as crop fertiliser: a multinational survey dataset. Data in Brief, [S.l.],pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufla.br/handle/1/50282
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352340921000780pt_BR
dc.languageen_USpt_BR
dc.publisherElsevierpt_BR
dc.rightsOpenAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceData in Briefpt_BR
dc.subjectDecentralized sanitationpt_BR
dc.subjectOpinion surveypt_BR
dc.subjectUrine source separationpt_BR
dc.subjectNew ecological paradigmpt_BR
dc.subjectNutrient recoverypt_BR
dc.subjectWastewater treatmentpt_BR
dc.subjectEnvironmental outlookpt_BR
dc.titleAttitudes of food consumers at universities towards recycling human urine as crop fertiliser: a multinational survey datasetpt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
953 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: