A comparison of the direct and indirect defence abilities of cultivated maize versus perennial and annual teosintes

dc.creatorNaranjo‑Guevara, Natalia
dc.creatorPeñaflor, Maria Fernanda Gomes Villalba
dc.creatorSilva, Diego Bastos
dc.creatorBento, José Mauricio Simões
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-18T20:13:58Z
dc.date.available2021-11-18T20:13:58Z
dc.date.issued2020-10
dc.description.abstractThe transition from a perennial to an annual life cycle, as well as domestication, are expected to increase plant growth and reproduction at the same time that anti-herbivore defences are reduced. Here, we investigated the effects of the life-history transition (the perennial teosinte Zea diploperennis to the annual teosinte Z. mays ssp. mexicana) and domestication of Zea (annual teosinte to the modern maize Z. mays ssp. mays) on direct and indirect defences against the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda. The direct defence of Zea was assessed by larval survival and nutritional indices based on food intake and utilisation. Indirect defence was measured in terms of the olfactory preference of the night-active predatory earwig Doru luteipes for nocturnal herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) from the teosintes and maize. Larval growth and survival were reduced on teosintes relative to maize. Whilst larvae fed on perennial teosinte had lower food intake indices, those on annual teosinte showed lower food utilisation indices relative to maize. The earwig preferred HIPVs emitted by teosintes over those by maize, but it did not discriminate between odours of herbivore-damaged annual and perennial teosinte. The nocturnal HIPV blend from maize contained the lowest total amount of fatty acid derivatives, while it had higher total amounts of terpenes compared to teosintes. Our study shows that the teosintes are better defended than maize in terms of direct and indirect defences; however, the perennial teosinte have stronger direct defences against the fall armyworm than the annual teosinte.pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationNARANJO-GUEVARA, N. et al. A comparison of the direct and indirect defence abilities of cultivated maize versus perennial and annual teosintes. Chemoecology, [S. I.], v. 31, p. 63-74, Feb. 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-020-00329-x.pt_BR
dc.identifier.urihttps://repositorio.ufla.br/handle/1/48503
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-020-00329-xpt_BR
dc.languageenpt_BR
dc.publisherSpringer Naturept_BR
dc.rightsrestrictAccesspt_BR
dc.sourceChemoecologypt_BR
dc.subjectGreen leaf volatilespt_BR
dc.subjectTritrophic interactionspt_BR
dc.subjectWild ancestorspt_BR
dc.subjectZeapt_BR
dc.subjectVoláteis de folhas verdespt_BR
dc.subjectInterações tritróficaspt_BR
dc.subjectMilho - Ancestrais selvagenspt_BR
dc.subjectMilho - Cultivopt_BR
dc.titleA comparison of the direct and indirect defence abilities of cultivated maize versus perennial and annual teosintespt_BR
dc.typeArtigopt_BR

Arquivos

Licença do pacote

Agora exibindo 1 - 1 de 1
Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Nome:
license.txt
Tamanho:
953 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descrição: