Artigo

Dung type or intraspecific variation in biomass: what is more important in determining dung beetle ecological function?

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura

Notas

Data

Orientadores

Editores

Coorientadores

Membros de banca

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Faculdade, Instituto ou Escola

Departamento

Programa de Pós-Graduação

Agência de fomento

Tipo de impacto

Áreas Temáticas da Extenção

Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável

Dados abertos

Resumo

Abstract

We evaluated the relative importance of dung type and intraspecific variation in biomass on dung beetle function by quantifying the ecological functions (dung removal and soil excavation) of two dung beetle species under laboratory conditions: Dichotomius bos, which preferentially feeds on herbivorous dung, and Chalcocopris hesperus, which is a generalist coprophagous species. Two treatments were used, cattle dung and swine dung, which consisted of a container with soil, dung, and two individuals of the two species that had been weighed prior to the experiment. Dichotomius bos was better at dung removal and soil excavation in the treatment containing the dung of its preference, where as for C. hesperus, there was no difference between the treatments. Only the quantity of ecological functions performed by D. bos was positively related to biomass. For D. bos, dung type was more important than biomass in dung removal, and biomass was more important than dung type in the amount of soil excavated. Neither biomass nor dung type explained C. hesperus functions. In conclusion, variables that affect ecological functions are dependent upon the species in question and the type of function evaluated, so dung beetle ecological functions are species-specific.

Descrição

Área de concentração

Agência de desenvolvimento

Palavra chave

Marca

Objetivo

Procedência

Impacto da pesquisa

Resumen

ISBN

DOI

Citação

BRAGA, P. et al. Dung type or intraspecific variation in biomass: what is more important in determining dung beetle ecological function? Oecologia Australis, [S.l.], v. 23, n. 3, p. 536-547, 2019.

Link externo

Avaliação

Revisão

Suplementado Por

Referenciado Por