Artigo

Top spoilage losses in maize silage sealed with plastic films with different permeabilities to oxygen

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura

Notas

Orientadores

Editores

Coorientadores

Membros de banca

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Wiley

Faculdade, Instituto ou Escola

Departamento

Programa de Pós-Graduação

Agência de fomento

Tipo de impacto

Áreas Temáticas da Extenção

Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável

Dados abertos

Resumo

Abstract

The quality of plastic films used for horizontal silos is important to limit losses in the upper silage layer. The aim of this work was to study the effectiveness of different plastic films in reducing the top losses in maize silage. The following treatments were evaluated: (i) coextruded polyethylene/polyamide oxygen barrier film (OB), (ii) polyethylene film (PE), (iii) polyvinyl chloride film (PVC), and (iv) coextruded PE/polyvinyl alcohol film (PVOH). These treatments differed according to oxygen permeability with values of 75, 722, 982 and 289 cm3 m−2 per 24 hour respectively. OB and PVOH films had better temperature and fermentation profiles than the more permeable films. The OB film was effective in reducing the dry‐matter (DM) losses during storage (82 g kg−1), and the PVOH film had an intermediate value of DM loss (101 g kg−1). PE and PVC films had higher losses (138 and 145 g kg−1 respectively). Oxygen permeability of the films promoted a positive correlation with DM losses (P  <  0·05; r 2 = 0·945). The results indicate that O2 permeability through the plastic film is a crucial factor for maintaining silage quality in the upper layer of the silo when it is perfectly sealed.

Descrição

Área de concentração

Agência de desenvolvimento

Palavra chave

Marca

Objetivo

Procedência

Impacto da pesquisa

Resumen

ISBN

DOI

Citação

BERNARDES, T. F.; NUSSIO, L. G.; AMARAL, R. C. do. Top spoilage losses in maize silage sealed with plastic films with different permeabilities to oxygen. Grass and Forage Science, [S.l.], v. 67, n. 1, p. 34-42, Mar. 2012. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00823.x.

Link externo

Avaliação

Revisão

Suplementado Por

Referenciado Por