Artigo

Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 vaccine immunogenicity test: evaluation of three mice (BALB/c, Swiss and CD-1®) and two challenge strains (544 and 2308)

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura

Notas

Orientadores

Editores

Coorientadores

Membros de banca

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Elsevier

Faculdade, Instituto ou Escola

Departamento

Programa de Pós-Graduação

Agência de fomento

Tipo de impacto

Áreas Temáticas da Extenção

Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável

Dados abertos

Resumo

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of different mouse strains (BALB/c, Swiss and CD-1®) and different challenge strains (Brucella abortus 544 and 2308) in the study of B. abortus vaccine (S19 and RB51) immunogenicity test in the murine model. No significant difference in B. abortus vaccine potency assay was found with the use of B. abortus 544 or B. abortus 2308 as challenge strain. Results of variance analysis showed an interaction between treatment and mouse strain; therefore these parameters could not be compared separately. When CD-1® groups were compared, those vaccinated showed significantly lower counts than non-vaccinated ones (P < 0.05), independently of the vaccine received (S19 or RB51). Similar results were observed on BALB/c groups. However, in Swiss mouse groups, S19 was more protective than RB51 (P <0.05), which showed protection when compared to the non-vaccinated group (P < 0.05). In summary, data from the present study showed that CD-1®, BALB/c and Swiss mice strains, as well as both challenge strains, B. abortus strains 544 and 2308, can be used in immunogenicity tests of S19 and RB51 vaccines.

Descrição

Área de concentração

Agência de desenvolvimento

Palavra chave

Marca

Objetivo

Procedência

Impacto da pesquisa

Resumen

ISBN

DOI

Citação

MIRANDA, K. L. et al. Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 vaccine immunogenicity test: evaluation of three mice (BALB/c, Swiss and CD-1®) and two challenge strains (544 and 2308). Vaccine, Kidlinton, v. 33, n. 4, p. 507-511, 15 Jan. 2015.

Link externo

Avaliação

Revisão

Suplementado Por

Referenciado Por