Artigo

Particleboards made from australian red cedar: processing variables and evaluation of mixedspecies

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura

Notas

Orientadores

Editores

Coorientadores

Membros de banca

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Forest Research Institute Malaysia

Faculdade, Instituto ou Escola

Departamento

Programa de Pós-Graduação

Agência de fomento

Tipo de impacto

Áreas Temáticas da Extenção

Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável

Dados abertos

Resumo

Abstract

This work was developed in two stages with the following aims: (1) to evaluate physical and mechanical properties of particleboards made from wood residues of Toona ciliata with target densities of 0.65 and 0.70 g cm -3 and 6 and 9% adhesive contents, and (2) to compare particleboards made from 100% T. ciliata particles (TC) with particleboards made from 50% T. ciliata particles mixed with 50% Pinus oocarpa particles (TC/P) or 50% Eucalyptus hybrid clone particles (TC/E). In the first stage, best results were obtained with 9% urea-formaldehyde and target density of 0.70 g cm -3. These processing variables were chosen for the production of mixed-species particleboards in the second stage of the work. TC particleboards had higher mechanical properties than mixed-species particleboards. For physical properties, TC particleboards were similar to TC/P particleboards. TC/E particleboards showed lowest results of mechanical properties and highest values of physical properties, and they are also suitable for interior applications. The results showed great potential in using wood residues of T. ciliata alone or mixed with Eucalyptus or Pinus species in particleboard production.

Descrição

Área de concentração

Agência de desenvolvimento

Palavra chave

Marca

Objetivo

Procedência

Impacto da pesquisa

Resumen

ISBN

DOI

Citação

BUFALINO, L. et al. Particleboards made from australian red cedar: processing variables and evaluation of mixedspecies. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, Kuala Lumpur, n. 24, v. 2, p. 162-172, Apr. 2012.

Link externo

Avaliação

Revisão

Suplementado Por

Referenciado Por