Artigo

Different inoculation methods for semi-dry processed coffee using yeasts as starter cultures

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura

Notas

Orientadores

Editores

Coorientadores

Membros de banca

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Elsevier

Faculdade, Instituto ou Escola

Departamento

Programa de Pós-Graduação

Agência de fomento

Tipo de impacto

Áreas Temáticas da Extenção

Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável

Dados abertos

Resumo

Abstract

This study evaluates the behavior of Saccharomyces (S.) cerevisiae (CCMA 0543), Candida (C.) parapsilosis (CCMA 0544), and Torulaspora (T.) delbrueckii (CCMA 0684) as starter cultures for semi-dry processed coffee using two inoculation methods: (1) direct inoculation and (2) bucket inoculation. The microbial population was evaluated by plating and real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The microbial metabolic changes of both bucket and direct inoculation methods during fermentation were evaluated using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). A sensorial test was also carried out. Citric and succinic acids were detected throughout the fermentation period. Chlorogenic acid concentration levels were higher for the bucket method after roasting. Roasted coffee beans also had a higher caffeine concentration, with the exception of the T. delbrueckii (CCMA0684) assay. Acids, pyrazines and pyridines were the main volatile compounds in both green and roasted coffee beans. Coffee cupping results proved that both inoculation methods scored well in terms of coffee quality. The bucket method favored the permanence of the microorganisms during coffee processing, especially the treatment inoculated with S. cerevisiae.

Descrição

Área de concentração

Agência de desenvolvimento

Palavra chave

Marca

Objetivo

Procedência

Impacto da pesquisa

Resumen

ISBN

DOI

Citação

MARTINEZ, S. J. et al. Different inoculation methods for semi-dry processed coffee using yeasts as starter cultures. Food Research International, Barking, v. 102, p. 333-340, Dec. 2017.

Link externo

Avaliação

Revisão

Suplementado Por

Referenciado Por