Artigo

Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura

Notas

Orientadores

Editores

Coorientadores

Membros de banca

Título da Revista

ISSN da Revista

Título de Volume

Editor

Wiley

Faculdade, Instituto ou Escola

Departamento

Programa de Pós-Graduação

Agência de fomento

Tipo de impacto

Áreas Temáticas da Extenção

Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável

Dados abertos

Resumo

Abstract

1. Agricultural expansion and intensification are major threats to tropical biodiversity. In addition to the direct removal of native vegetation, agricultural expansion often elicits other human-induced disturbances, many of which are poorly addressed by existing environmental legislation and conservation programmes. This is particularly true for tropical freshwater systems, where there is considerable uncertainty about whether a legislative focus on protecting riparian vegetation is sufficient to conserve stream fauna. 2. To assess the extent to which stream fish are being effectively conserved in agricul-tural landscapes, we examined the spatial distribution of assemblages in river ba-sins to identify the relative importance of human impacts at instream, riparian and catchment scales, in shaping observed patterns. We used an extensive dataset on the ecological condition of 83 low-order streams distributed in three river basins in the eastern Brazilian Amazon. 3. We collected and identified 24,420 individual fish from 134 species. Multiplicative diversity partitioning revealed high levels of compositional dissimilarity (DS) among stream sites (DS = 0.74 to 0.83) and river basins (DS = 0.82), due mainly to turnover (77.8% to 81.8%) rather than nestedness. The highly heterogeneous fish faunas in small Amazonian streams underscore the vital importance of enacting measures to protect forests on private lands outside of public protected areas. 4. Instream habitat features explained more variability in fish assemblages (15%–19%) than riparian (2%–12%), catchment (4%–13%) or natural covariates (4%–11%). Although grouping species into functional guilds allowed us to explain up to 31% of their abundance (i.e. for nektonic herbivores), individual riparian – and catchment – scale predictor variables that are commonly a focus of environmental legislation explained very little of the observed variation (partial R2 values mostly <5%). 5. Policy implications. Current rates of agricultural intensification and mechanization in tropical landscapes are unprecedented, yet the existing legislative frameworks fo-cusing on protecting riparian vegetation seem insufficient to conserve stream envi-ronments and their fish assemblages. To safeguard the species-rich freshwater biota of small Amazonian streams, conservation actions must shift towards manag-ing whole basins and drainage networks, as well as agricultural practices in already-cleared land.

Descrição

Área de concentração

Agência de desenvolvimento

Palavra chave

Marca

Objetivo

Procedência

Impacto da pesquisa

Resumen

ISBN

DOI

Citação

LEAL, C. G. et al. Is environmental legislation conserving tropical stream faunas? A large-scale assessment of local, riparian and catchment-scale influences on Amazonian fish. Journal of Applied Ecology, [S.l.], v. 55, n. 3, p. 1312-1326, May 2018. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13028.

Link externo

Avaliação

Revisão

Suplementado Por

Referenciado Por