Artigo
Tropical soil pH and sorption complex prediction via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry
Carregando...
Notas
Data
Orientadores
Editores
Coorientadores
Membros de banca
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Elsevier
Faculdade, Instituto ou Escola
Departamento
Programa de Pós-Graduação
Agência de fomento
Tipo de impacto
Áreas Temáticas da Extenção
Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável
Dados abertos
Resumo
Abstract
Portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF) spectrometry delivers results rapidly, at low-cost, and without generating chemical residues. This study aimed to predict soil pH, sum of bases (SB), base saturation percentage (BSP), cation exchange capacity (CEC), and Al saturation (Alsat) of 2017 contrasting Brazilian soil samples through the association of pXRF and three different algorithms [Cubist, Random forest (RF), and stepwise multiple linear regression (SMLR)]. Soil samples were collected from the surface (SURF) and subsurface (SUB) horizons in seven Brazilian states. The prediction models were generated for the SURF and SUB horizons separately and combined (SURF + SUB dataset). Overall, the best predictions were achieved via Cubist followed by RF. For the pH predictions, the model combining SURF and SUB horizons data presented better results. Satisfactory results were achieved for the predictions of SB (validation R2 = 0.86), BSP (validation R2 = 0.81) and Alsat (R2 = 0.76). Moreover, promising results were obtained for predicting pH (R2 = 0.63). Notably, CaO appeared as the most influential variable for soil property prediction models. Overall, pXRF showed great potential for predicting soil fertility properties for diversified tropical soils with low cost, rapidity, and without chemical waste generation.
Descrição
Área de concentração
Agência de desenvolvimento
Palavra chave
Marca
Objetivo
Procedência
Impacto da pesquisa
Resumen
ISBN
DOI
Citação
TEIXEIRA, A. F. dos et al. Tropical soil pH and sorption complex prediction via portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Geoderma, [S. I.], v. 361, Mar. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114132.
