Análise jurisprudencial da aplicação do interdito proibitório relacionado aos casos de greve no Tribunal Regional do Trabalho de Minas Gerais

Abstract

This study aimed to demonstrate, through jurisprudential analysis, how the Regional Labor Court of Minas Gerais behaves before prohibitory injunction, when related to the fundamental right to strike. In that purpose, this research briefly presented the main aspects of ownership. Subsequently, will be study the change of judicial competence despites the Labor Court with the advent of Constitutional Amendment n° 45, from 2004. In a third and a fourth moments, the prohibitory injunction was discussed, from the point of view of the civil law, then, passing to the relation of this institute with the fundamental right of strike, which was given, mainly, by the binding precedent 23, of the Federal Supreme Court. Finally, a jurisprudential search was made on the subject, resulting in the conclusion of the research, which crossed the decision opinion, by the tendency in the aforementioned court.